Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
More Links
|
 Wednesday, January 09, 2008
What do writers think editor's responsibilities are?
Posted by Rachel
Last month I asked editors what they considered to be their responsibilites to writers and readers, and now it's the writers turn. Authors, let me know what you think the editor's responsibilities are to you, and to the intended audience.
I will discuss what you have to say in next week's newsletter, so contact me by the 11th. Either post to the comments section here or email me at nsswmATfwpubsDOTcom. If you agree with what any of the editor's said, then tell me that, too.
I look forward to hearing what you have to say. Inside Peek
1/9/2008 9:28:54 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, December 19, 2007
The Editorial Process
Posted by Rachel
I received an email with a question in response to the recent NSSWM newsletter (see blog post), and I thought that as more than one person probably has the same question, I would answer it on the blog.
Here's the question:
“Back in college I got to sit down with one of my professors who wanted to publish one of my poems in a journal that he edited; we went through the poem, talking about different lines and how they might work better, even coming up with a title that I liked better than what I'd originally named it.
"I'd always figured it was the same with fiction; in fact, I'd sort of looked forward to that part, collaborating with an unbiased editor to make my work stronger… After reading your article, though, I'm wondering what the editing processing is really like when a magazine accepts your short story or a publisher accepts your novel. Does the editor go through the piece, marking suggested changes in red, and then send it back to the writer to revise the piece based on that? Or does the editor make those changes himself, and then send the revised piece back to the author for approval? Or does the editor make the changes and the writer doesn't get to see what was done until she picks up a copy of the magazine or novel at her local bookstore? Or does every publisher handle it differently?
"So, would you mind shedding a little light on how that part of the publishing process works, for those of us who haven't experienced it yet?”
~Andi
Andi was correct in thinking that the process is different for each publisher, but it also varies from editor to editor, and editors sometimes deal with individual writers differently. Confused yet? I’ll give you a basic outline and tell you where things can vary.
First off, let’s talk about publishing short stories. For most magazines and journals they don’t have the time (or money) to go through significant revisions with you unless you happen to be a big name author. That said, some will send back your ms with comments/suggestions, even if they wont publish it (but don’t count on it unless they promise to do so in their guidelines).
Usually magazines/journals will only take stories that require minimal revisions, like “Can we cut this one scene?” or grammar fixes. For grammatical issues, the editors frequently wont contact the author about making changes unless they’re unsure of meaning. Some publishers send you galleys, some don’t. Basically, don’t expect a warm, fuzzy review process for your short stories.
Moving on to novels. Once again, I make the disclaimer that every publisher and editor functions differently and I’m speaking in broad terms.
Once your manuscript is accepted (or sometimes before that), the editor goes through and does some developmental editing. In this stage, they look at concepts and story flow. Does it make sense for the hero to abandon his friend in chapter six? Is that explanation of New York’s subway system too long and convoluted? Does the author consistently have a problem establishing the point of view? The editor makes notes of these things and composes a letter to the author covering all those issues. The specificity of this letter depends on the issues raised and the editor’s relationship with the writer.
Speaking for myself, when I’m sending comments and suggestions to one of my writers I try to be as specific as possible, especially if I haven’t worked with them very much or they don’t have much experience. Some writers I just say “Do this instead of that” and let them go at it because I trust their ability to understand and apply what I’m asking of them. Others require a more detailed explanation, and some can't revise very well, and after the fourth try I end up doing the revisions (and make a note not to use them again).
Back to the letter. This letter usually accompanies a marked-up version of your ms (print or digital). Many publishers are going digital, so frequently the whole exchange takes place via email. While I still do my initial edits on paper (it’s so much easier to cross reference items and check things, etc.), I use the Track Changes in Word to make notes for my writers. Some changes I will go ahead and make (like cutting sentences) and others I will just leave a note (eg. "This is confusing; do you mean A or B? If you mean A, please clarify in this way. If you want it be ambigous, make the intent clear").
The author gets to incorporate and apply the editor's suggestions. Sometimes phone calls or a series of emails are initiated if the author doesn't understand what the editor is asking or if they don't agree with the suggestions. This the "fun" part Andi was looking forward to. After speaking with authors and editors, this part of the editorial process can be enjoyable, or incredibly painful. Patience and flexibility are needed on both sides.
After the author returns the manuscript with corrections, the editor goes through it again and sees how well the author has incorporated their suggestions. At this point the manuscript is either sent back for more revisions, or the editors take care of it themselves. If the author was asked to make revisions during the submissions process, this is also the point where the editor decides whether or not to take the manuscript.
Sometimes the editor has no developmental edits, and once your manuscript is accepted you have don't see it again until it arrives in book form.
Once the developmental edits are done, the manuscript is sent to the copy editors for all the nitty-gritty grammar and style stuff. The text is formatted for the book, the editor edits the proofs and voila, we’re done. It’s a rare thing for the writer to be involved after the developmental stage, except occasionally with the cover.
However, unless your publisher is kind of lame, you don’t have to wait until your book arrives in the bookstore to get a copy. Usually you’re sent a copy (or ten) once the books are in-house.
As I said earlier, this is a basic outline and the editorial experience is different for everyone, even for the editors. I hope this answers the question sufficiently. Feel free to chime in with your own experiences.
I'm off for the holidays and wont return until after New Year's. Have a wonderful holiday season and I'll see you next year!
(Yes, I know that was corny but I just couldn't resist.) Inside Peek | Q&A
12/19/2007 1:52:42 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Thursday, December 13, 2007
Editor’s responsibilities to writers and readers
Posted by Rachel
I recently read an article about the role of editor and it got me thinking about how everyone has a different conception of what an editor’s role and responsibilities are. I thought it would make a great article for the newsletter, so I emailed a bunch of editors here at F&W and from the NSSWM database to get their opinion. My question was:
Recent events in the literary world have inspired me to write a piece about the editor's role as an intermediary between the writer and reader for the next Novel & Short Story Writer's Market newsletter, and I want to get some input from editors. Could you please briefly (2-3 sentences) tell me what you think an editor's responsibility is to both the writer and the reader?
I heard back from 14 of them, and my analysis and commentary are in the newsletter (comes/came out December 14th, and yes, I can get it to you if you missed it), and here are their responses in full:
"My sole responsibility is to the ideal manuscript a writer aspires to. I will do what I can to help the writer toward that ideal. Why would I do anything else?"
Howard Junker Editor, ZYZZYVA
"I am of the conviction that the editor is the second writer of any work. Rarely, if ever, does an editor accept a work for publication while allowing it to remain in the state it was received from the author. On the best day, there will be a said-bookism or an adverb somewhere in the work that needs weeding out. The editor's work is to finish any submitted piece, utilizing her vast knowledge of style, content, forms, and literary history."
Skadi meic Beorh Editor, The Willows
"To me, the editor's responsibility is foremost to the reader. I do my best to take care of our authors and treat them and their work with the respect they deserve, but my ears are always tuned to the readership, listening for their complaints and suggestions. Readers cannot--and wouldn't want to--wade through every story in my slushpile, so I see myself as an aggregator, discovering the tales of most interest to my magazine's demographic, and presenting those in a pleasing format."
Ben Thomas Lead Editor, The Williows
"I believe an editor's primary responsibility is to the magazine's readership. As a magazine editor, I believe my job is to select stories that will appeal to readers and assure that those stories have been edited to the high standard that our readers have come to expect. That said, as an editor, I have a duty to treat the writers in a fair and businesslike way and assure that we communicate clearly through the editorial process."
David Lee Summers Editor, Tales of the Talisman Magazine
"In my opinion, an editor's chief responsibilities are to being passionate and honest. Everything else is subjective. Let's face it, an editor chooses what gets in, but every writer who's ever gotten a rejection slip thinks that editors can't do their jobs properly.
"There's no real criteria for defining quality, so one can't really argue that the editor's job is to safeguard the world of published works against that which isn't of high quality; 'bad' editors would swear that they're doing this as staunchly as 'good' editors. (Assign whatever value you like to 'bad' and 'good'.)
"The best we can do, then, is our best. We have to greedily seek those works that make us proud to say we've published them, and respectfully decline everything else."
Rev. Brian Worley Editor, Susurrus
"I think an editor should be very selective to provide only the finest manuscripts to the readers. He/she should be encouraging and inspiring to new writers by helping writers to establish long-term goals."
Andy Zhang Editor, Aberdeen Bay
"The main job of an editor is to make sure the reader is entertained. The editor has to find writing good enough to fascinate the reader (hopefully fascinating enough to inspire the reader to subscribe!). To the writer the editor has to be generous, tough, fair, and open-- hard to accomplish on the best of days but always the goal."
Gavin Grant Editor, Small Beer Press
"I think it is our responsibility to try to choose stories that are uniquely conceived, expertly crafted, and in some way broaden or deepen our understanding of what it is to be human. If we do that, we can't help but respect the author's creative work and our goal is obviously to give the reader something meaningful and affecting."
Linda Swanson-Davies Editor, Glimmertrain Stories
"An editor owes a writer genuine appreciation for their work and also their willingness to risk rejection of that work. If an editor is genuinely appreciative, then naturally they will provide a writer with criticism that is thoughtful and constructive rather than rushed, offhand or even hurtful. Constructive criticism is an editor’s responsibility.
"An editor owes a reader a similar sort of respect which, I think, becomes expressed in the assumption that a reader wants to be entertained but also truly moved. It seems to me that when an editor makes this assumption they will then inevitably choose short stories for their journal that are complex and emotionally true rather than merely clever. I think that is their responsibility towards a reader."
Natalia Nebel Chicago Quarterly Review
"As an editor, my responsibility is to the reader. I have to make sure the information is accessible, accurate and understandable by my core audience. I try not to destroy a writer’s voice, but meaning is more important than tone."
Megan Lane Patrick Senior Editor, HOW magazine and books
"In essence, an editor is a professional reader. From that perspective, we coach the writer into making the experience work for the reader, whatever the type of book. Editing a cookbook can be a lot more straightforward ('No, really—the reader needs to know what temperature to set the oven.') than fiction ('You’re telling me you kept changing the spelling of the main character’s name on purpose?'), but the question remains the same: Does this work for the reader?"
Vanessa Lyman Editor, Northlight Books
"I believe the prescriptive-nonfiction editor’s job is to maintain the voice and vision of the author, while also ensuring the finished book is clear, informative, and engaging and has actionable value for the reader."
Lauren Mosko Editor, Writer's Digest Books
"I believe an editor’s responsibilities to the reader and the writer are different, but both work to achieve the same goal: a worthy book. The editor’s responsibility to a writer is to keep the vision for their book clear, and help the writer execute that vision without changing the intent of the work. The editor’s responsibility to the reader is to ask all the questions of the writer that the reader might ask as they are reading.
"In addition, in this day and age, an editor has a responsibility to their publisher, to create a saleable product."
Amy Schell Editor, Writer's Digest Books & HOW books
"As an editor of fine art books, I work with many left-brain artists who sometimes have trouble transcribing their creative processes into words. My job is to break apart the written subject matter then ask lots of questions to fill in any holes. The reader should never have to translate the artist's stream of consciousness to understand the message, though it's important to edit with sensitivity to the artist's personality, voice and style."
Sarah Laichas Associate Editor, North Light Books
We’ve heard from the editors, now I want to know what the writers think; same question as above, but from the writer’s perspective. Respond in the comments here or email me at nsswm AT fwpubs DOT com. Please include the type of writing you do (fantasy short stories, literary novels, nonfiction, etc.). I will look at the writer’s perspective in the January newsletter, so if you’re not signed up for the newsletter, go here.
Inside Peek
12/13/2007 9:30:43 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Monday, December 03, 2007
Follow the directions!
Posted by Rachel
It's kind of ironic. I mean, editors chastize writers all the time for not following submission guidelines, yet editors aren't that much better. I just did a batch of verfications, and less than half the people followed the directions. That is worse than normal, but still, editors should be better at following the directions, right? After all, all they have to do in this instance is indicate what changes they want made. I don't care if you put the changes in a bulleted list, use brackets, bold, caps, or a combination thereof, but PLEASE show me what you want changed. I'm not that good a guesser, and I'm definitely not a mind reader.
Why is this such a big deal? When I get an email which says "Corrected listing below," and within that listing they don't indicate WHAT they changed, I have to do one of two things: 1) Compare their listing with the one in my database on a line-by-line basis to see what they changed. 2) Copy and paste the new listing in, format it, and then read through it and make sure they didn't add anything funky or misspelled something. Both of those options take a lot of time I would rather spend doing something else.
Then I get some listing verifcations that just make me smile because they are so easy to update. For instance, today's prize for Easiest Listing To Update goes to The Ledge Magazine. Their listing looked like this: Receives [60] mss/month. Accepts 3-4 mss/issue. Manuscript published 6 months after acceptance. Published [Xujun Eberlein,] Franny French, Clifford Garstang, [Richard Jespers,] Al Sims.
See how easy it is to pick out the changes? Since today even those people who did follow the directions (so far) didn't make things that clear, Pubilsher Tim Monaghan is one of my favorite people right now.
Okay, vent is done. Time for me to go back to my pile. ~Sigh~ Inside Peek
12/3/2007 3:02:33 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, November 14, 2007
The publishers have to sell, too
Posted by Rachel
A while ago I saw this article that mentions sales reps speed dating with booksellers (similar to the speed pitching writers do to agents/editors at some conferences), and that coupled with my recent influx of magazines got me thinking about how books get into bookstores.
Most writers know they need to sale their book to an agent or editor and to readers, but don’t realize there’s more to the selling process than that. Getting your book into stores can be a lot like getting your book published in the first place. Publishers have to give great pitches and hope someone takes this wonderful book they’ve produced. They have a book that they know is great, and they just have to convince the buyer to order it in good quantities. Also, the publisher gets to try and convince the buyer to feature the book in some way.
Sales and marketing spend a lot time building a rapport with buyers. Reps need to know what the buyers want and require, and buyers need to trust that when the reps say something is excellent it truly is.
Reps go into meetings armed with a couple different things. One is some sort of form that has all the basic information for a book (title, author name and bio, book description, price point, release date). Frequently they’ll bring in sales or market data to support their arguments. Covers, if already designed, are brought to the table. For some books, BLADS are made. BLAD stands for Basic Layout And Design. A BLAD is basically a 6-12 page pamphlet with the book cover and a sample of the interior. It gives buyers an idea of what the book is going to look like when it’s done. This is more important for nonfiction books, children’s books and graphic novels than adult fiction.
The sales reps use these tools and their knowledge of the market to convince buyers to order copies of the book, and to agree to promote it in some way.
My previous ignorance has gotten me thinking. What are some of the aspects of book publishing you didn’t even think about for ages? Or, what part of the mysterious process do you want to know more about? If I don’t know, I do know who to ask. Inside Peek
11/14/2007 11:39:15 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Monday, November 05, 2007
How NSSWM comes together
Posted by Rachel
Last week I mentioned starting work on verifications, but didn’t really explain what that was. The backbone of NSSWM is the listings, and a large part of my job is making sure those listings are up to date. Year round I’m looking for and contacting publishers, magazines/journals, contests and conferences we don’t have in our database. (If you want to be listed, our forms can be found here.)
I started working on the 2009 edition (which comes out in the fall of 2008) over the summer. The articles and interviews were assigned in August/September, and I’ve already gotten a few drafts from some of my freelance writers. Right now I’m working on the debut authors feature (some good books in there) and doing an email interview with sci-fi author Elizabeth Moon. Soon I'll be getting more interviews and articles from my freelance writers, and I'll need to edit those.
The current phase is verifications. Verifications are the emails/letters we send to those listed in NSSWM with their current information to ask if the data is correct. If it is, we get an “All correct” response, and if not, they write back with the changes clearly indicated by using bold, caps, brackets, colored font or a combination thereof. (Well, most people follow the instructions.)
So if a publisher wanted to change how many debut novels they've published recently, they would do so like this: Plans [2-3] first novels this year.
Sometimes people respond with a request for us to remove their listing. The reasons range from the fact they no longer publish fiction to they're going out of business to wanting fewer submissions, or sometimes we’re not told why. Fortunately, I don’t get very many of those.
As I get the responses I enter the changes in the database and mark the listing as verified. Since this is my first time doing verifications, I have had to decide the best way for me to keep track of which verifications I have or have not entered. In a few weeks I will send out a second email to those who haven’t responded yet. In late December I will send letters to those don’t have email (~sigh~ join the 21st century please) and those who aren’t responding to their email.
Every time I send out verifications I get many eddresses bounced back as invalid, so I get to go to the publisher's website and see if I can track down an accurate email address for them. If not, they get snail mail.
The bulk of the verifications will be done by the end of January, but I’ll be doing these follow-ups through March. It’s a long process because so many people don’t bother to respond or they change their contact info and I have to track them down, plus I’m adding new listings the whole time-just not as many as I was over the summer.
That’s a brief peek into some of what goes into getting this book published, and an explanation as to why I might not be blogging every day. Inside Peek
11/5/2007 2:27:41 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Listings in NSSWM
Posted by Rachel
I got a question last week about how we list items in NSSWM and I thought others might have the same question.
Dear Editor,
I was just going thru my 2006 edition of Novel & Short Story Writer's Market (I know, I need a new one, but right now I only have one story I am trying to sell), and comparing it with my previous edition of the same book, from 2003. I noticed that several publications were no longer listed in the 2006 edition, but when I looked up these journals online, I saw that they were still in existence. The ones I noticed were: Evansville Review, Cairn, Pembroke Magazine, and Santa Monica Review.
It made me wonder whether or not Novel & Short Story Writer's Market really has the most complete listing of short story markets available. Perhaps there is something I don't understand going on here, for instance, maybe journals only get listed if they want to be. Can you help clear this up for me? I should add that I am a fan of your publications, and I think you provide a fine service for all the aspiring writers out there. Thank you for listening, and I look forward to your reply.
There are several reasons why some of the magazines/journals, contests or publishers may no longer be listed, even when they're still publishing. NSSWM is a voluntary listing, and some journals request removal since they can't handle a larger volume of submissions or for other reasons. We will also remove a listing if we have been unable to verify or update their information for several years. There are also some publishers with bad business practices, and we might remove a listing for that reason. Of the magazines mentioned above, all but one are in the 2008 edition.
We do try to be the most complete, and I believe we are the best resource for the range of fiction we cover. I hope I've been able to address any lingering questions. If you have a question about NSSWM, or anything writing related, write me at nsswm AT fwpubs DOT com. Inside Peek | Q&A
10/16/2007 9:49:01 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, October 09, 2007
Actually, it's...
Posted by Rachel
It never ceases to amaze me that no matter how many people read through a book before publication, things always slip through the cracks. For example, the address listed in NSSWM 2008 for the Southwest Writers Contests is correct, but the one for their conference is wrong. Thanks to Southwest Writers for letting us know.
Just to be clear, the address for Southwest Writers (the contests and conference) is 3721 Morris NE Ste A, Albuquerque NM 87111.
Mistakes like that can be maddening, even though we do everything we can to prevent them. I'm sure you've had the experience of discovering "they're" instead of "their" or "an" instead of "and" while reading. One of my favorite typos is in my dad's old edition of Anne McCaffrey's Dragonrider's of Pern (which I borrowed almost 15 years ago and he is never getting back), where the name of the main protagonist is spelled incorrectly. I remember reading that as a teenager and scoffing at the ineptitude of the editor who let that slip by. I decided I would become an editor and one day work on Anne McCaffrey's books, and I would NEVER be so careless as to let a typo like that get through.
Ah, the conceit of youth. I didn't realize then how much editors have to do in a day. Most editors are actively working on 3-7 books at a time (that's not including the ones in the early stages or already sent out to production), plus working on other things, like finding new books. An editor does a lot more than look for typos.
Anyway, it's not purely the editor's fault; the books don't just go through them. A basic editorial process has the manuscript go from the author to the editor, back to the author for any changes, returned to the editor, then on to the copy-editor, then to the editor again. Next the manuscript it passed to the book designer (to get the manuscript formatted), then back to the editor, sent out for proofs, back to the editor, and then to the editor's supervisor for final approval before getting sent to the printer. Of course, some presses and books have more, or less, editorial review than others, but you get the picture.
This isn't for excuse mistakes, because they're not fine to have, but just to show that no matter how diligent we are things are missed. Hopefully it's a rare thing. Inside Peek
10/9/2007 3:28:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Peek into editor's life
Posted by Rachel
I know I already posted, but I just had to share.
For those of you who don't know, a large portion of the publishing world is female, and in the Writer's Digest Books (Thanks to Brian for pointing out my lack of specificity) and Writer's Market teams the proportions are a bit...extreme. WD has no men on the editorial or designer end, and WM is down to two. I feel sorry for them on days like this.
I came into the office this morning to hear that WD and Betterway editor Michelle Ehrhard was in labor. (I love the fact that the editor of Writer Mama, by Christina Katz, is becoming a mom.) Of course we were all giggly and excited--the last time someone had a baby on our teams was years ago. This afternoon Greg, one of our production team, was nearby when we got the call that Michelle had her baby. Greg beat a fast retreat muttering something about baby fever as the rest of us crowded around to get the details. Michelle had a baby girl, Bridget Joelle (we're unsure of the spelling so far), and both are doing fine.
Congratulations Michelle! Inside Peek
9/18/2007 3:40:58 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, August 30, 2007
The End-Result Rush
Posted by Rachel
Just to point it out, Peter Selgin, the author of By Cunning and Craft from Writer's Digest Books, has a nifty article about the long road to publication and that one novel that still hasn't sold after umpteen revisions. Unfortunately, "A Short History of Everything: The End is Nothing, the Road is All" is not one of the articles on the Poets & Writers website, so you’ll have to track down the print copy to read the article.
I wanted to point it out because I find it amazing that I know who he is, and I got to help with the proofs for his book. I'm still surprised to see articles and books written by people I have a connection to. I remember when I saw an article from one of my professors in Writer’s Chronicle years ago and I finally realized that there is a world outside of my college, and there might be more to my professor than I thought. That naive awe catches up with me on occasion.
Seeing others succeed is wonderful, but seeing something you worked on appear in print is something altogether different. It’s a rush to see the end results of your dreams and efforts.
I was on the staff of Ellipsis, my college literary magazine, the first time I felt the end-result rush. I had a few sleepless nights as the prose editor trying to choose which stories to include, and then a few more bad nights when one of the stories I picked had already been accepted elsewhere and the author had neglected to inform us (PLEASE don’t do that to editors, especially if it’s a college publication. Student editors are fragile creatures). Finally it was done. Our beautiful magazine. I almost cried the first time I held it (Yes, I know I'm emotional). I'm NEVER getting rid of my copy.
One of the proudest moments of my life was when I was in a Barnes & Noble in Boston with my mom back in March and I took her over to the writing reference section. I was able to pull out book after book I had helped on in some way. From choosing illustrations to developmental edits to going over the final proofs, these were all texts I had touched in some way to make them (I hope) a little better than they were before, to be the best version of themselves.
I understand the thrill writers get in seeing their first book in print, because even as an editor I feel it too. How do you feel when you see your stories in print? Is the second time different from the first? Inside Peek
8/30/2007 2:38:26 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, August 23, 2007
The Mysteries of Cover Art Unveiled
Posted by Rachel
I know we’ve all had a time when we looked at the cover for the latest novel in our favorite series and realized that the main character depicted on the cover doesn’t look like the character described in the book. How do these things happen? And who decides on the cover anyway?
Sometimes the development of cover art is a glorious thing that fills the author with glee, other times it's a tragedy over which they have no control. Science fiction author Tobias Buckell is so excited about his newest cover that he recently posted the progression of cover images for his book, The Sly Mongoose. In his case, Buckell sent his editor a scene that he thought would make good cover art. His editor forwarded the scene to the artist, and the series of sketches were made. Voila, we have a cover.
The process of designing a cover varies from publisher to publisher and across genres, but here’s a breakdown of how covers are developed.
First the art director or executive editor chooses an illustrator or designer. Some publishers work entirely in-house, while others have a list of freelance illustrators or use a combination of in-house and freelance work. The author, editor, sales and marketing compiles a small packet of information detailing what the book is about (including a writing excerpt), the tone of the book and the basic feel they want for the cover and gives it to the illustrator/designer.
The designer goes away and comes up with a couple different options. The editorial team looks at the covers and decides which one they like best and make suggestions for improvement. The designer goes back and revises the chosen cover. Once the editorial team approves the cover, it is presented to a larger committee that includes sales and marketing personnel, who then give the final approval for the cover, or send the designer back once again for revisions.
Sometimes this process is very quick and the first design is perfect and few revisions are necessary, while other times the designer goes through 5-6 major revisions before finding a concept that works, and then the designer gets to fiddle with details for weeks.
The author usually gets to see the cover either just before or after the final approval. This is where the agony comes in. Sometimes the cover looks nothing like you expected. At this point, unless the cover is ridiculously off (there's a huge dog on the cover and no dog in the entire book), there's not much to be done and you just have to trust your publisher. Fortunetly, the Buckell experience of glee is much more common.
That's your basic “how covers are made.” One exception to this outline is when the illustrator/designer reads the whole book and works with the author to develop the cover before ever sending it on to editorial/sales/marketing. However, this generally happens when you work with the Stephen King or Margaret Atwood of cover art.
What are your experiences with the cover development process at your publisher? Does anyone have an experience where they hated the cover and then grew to love it? Inside Peek
8/23/2007 11:47:20 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, July 26, 2007
What's an editor do, anyway?
Posted by Rachel
I get this question a lot, and so here's a really nice editorial at Salon, "Let us now praise editors," written by former editor Gary Kamiya. I appreciated (and related) to his description that "Editors are craftsmen, ghosts, psychiatrists, bullies, sparring partners, experts, enablers, ignoramuses, translators, writers, goalies, friends, foremen, wimps, ditch diggers, mind readers, coaches, bomb throwers, muses and spittoons—sometimes all while working on the same piece." If you're about to work with an editor—or have always wanted a glimpse inside your editor's head, read on.
Inside Peek | Q&A
7/26/2007 3:05:33 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
|